Martyrs (2008)
Sheesh… Where to start with this one..?
I was curious about Martyrs
because, while it had a reputation for being extremely violent and
disturbing, it also seemed to be pretty well regarded, garnering high
positions in quite a lot of rankings of “best horror films of the
decade,” and so on.
I knew that the film
involved graphic scenes of women and children being subjected to abuse,
and was not going to be a comfortable experience, so it languished in my
“to watch” pile for a considerable time before I felt mentally robust
enough to sit down and watch it. And yeah, it was very grim viewing
indeed.
Without giving away the plot (and it
does have a plot—it’s certainly not a mindless film) it is pretty much
non-stop violence, trauma, and torture for its entire running time.
Having looked at various reviews of the film online, one response that
seemed to come up repeatedly in various iterations was, “It’s a good
film, but I never, ever, want to sit through it again.” I feel pretty
much the same. But I guess I need to qualify “good” in that context,
then.
I watched an interview with the
director, Pascal Laugier, and he is, (unsurprisingly) a very thoughtful
and articulate guy. He is clearly a massive fan of genre cinema, and
referenced several other notoriously violent horror films during the
interview. One thing he said about Martyrs is that he was aiming
to make a film that was very compelling and which kept the audience on
the edge of their seats and wanting to see what happens next–a “page
turner,” so to speak. I think in that respects, the film succeeds very
well. I think I probably watched the whole movie with my mouth open.
There are some great twists in the narrative, where it almost pivots and
turns into a different style of film.
I haven't seen any of his other films, but I have a feeling that like,
for example, Lars von Trier, Laugier is perhaps a
director who likes putting his audience through the wringer a bit, and
messing with their heads.
It is very well-shot, with a kind of
steady-cam-like approach that pulls you right into the events occurring
on the screen, and the performances of the two female leads are also
excellent—especially considering how physically demanding they must have
been.Where I think the film fails, though, is
that the “pay off”–the revelation of why all the stuff in the film is
happening, and the final conclusion, are just too weak after the ordeal
of sitting through such a grueling film. In the end it all felt pretty
empty, and if you are going to subject your audience to that much
trauma, then I think you need to leave them with something more
substantial.

Comments
Post a Comment