Angel Heart (1987)
The last time I saw Alan Parker’s Angel Heart
was as a teenager back in the 80s, shortly after it came out. I enjoyed
it a lot back then, and it has been on my subconscious “must rewatch”
list for a while now. Fortuitously, a friend’s son was kind enough to
lend me his blu-ray of the movie while I was visiting their house a few
days ago.
As an aside, that visit to my
friend’s house was the first time have really been out socializing since
I stopped drinking. There were a few people there and most others were
having a few beers or whatnot. Drinking normally—not to excess or
getting intoxicated. I was sticking to my alcohol-free lager. I enjoyed
myself, but I can’t say it was a breeze, exactly, and thoughts of caving
in and having drink crossed my mind several times, but it was more
like, “Imagine if I did that...” rather than a real craving, so
that, at least, is encouraging.
I remember
also being encouraged when my friend’s son came home part way through
our visit. He’s in his early thirties, and generally hangs out with us
if he is around. He’s a cool young guy who loves music and horror
movies, so I always have something to talk to him about. But what
impressed me was that when he came home, he made himself a cup of tea
and asked if anyone else wanted one. I remember thinking, “Damn—if that
was me, and I came home to find everyone drinking and chatting, I would
immediately have reached into the fridge for a beer.” But he just made
tea. I remember thinking, “Wow—that’s what normal people do. They can
take it or leave it. He probably just didn’t feel like drinking
alcohol—imagine that!”
Anyway, despite my friend's well-stocked fridge, I returned home sober, and with a borrowed copy of Angel Heart in my bag to boot.I’ll not go into the plot of Angel Heart,
(1) because it’s such a well-known movie, and (2) because the less you
know about it going in the better. I will say this: in addition to being
a horror movie, it’s also a gradually unfolding mystery, so if you
haven’t seen it, you’ll enjoy it more if you avoid reading anything about it before you do.
It’s
an impressive movie in so many ways—the photography, the locations, the
cast and acting, and the story itself. Right from the opening scene the
movie evokes a dark urban gothic atmosphere—very much in the neo-noir
style. The story begins in New York and then moves to Louisiana.
America’s deep south is very evocatively depicted with oppressive
semi-tropical rain hammering down almost constantly.
Watching
the movie put me in mind of John Connolly’s heavily
occult/horror-infused novels featuring the private detective Charlie
Parker. I’ve only read the first few books in the series, but they also
often seem to be set in America’s deep south. Highly recommended for
fans of Angel Heart, which, of course, is itself an adaptation of a well-regarded novel.I could be wrong, but don’t think there is a single jump-scare in Angel Heart.
The horror comes from a sense of gradually encroaching dread, and of
creeping inevitability. Without giving too much away, there is a lot
premonitionary imagery in the movie. Several of the more shocking
developments are foreshadowed by subtle hints that would not be so
conspicuous on a first viewing. In that respect, it put in me in mind of
Nicolas Roeg’s Don’t Look Now (1973).
There
was, however, one small aspect of the film’s climax that I thought was a
bit cheesy—and it was repeated twice. As I said, I want to be careful
about putting any spoilers here, but lets just say it’s a gimmick that
you see frequently in many conventional horror films of 80s, and it
seemed jarringly crass and out of place here, given the refined quality
of the film as whole.So ended my third week of sobriety. So far, so good.

Comments
Post a Comment